Wayne's Discernment

Taxing A Recession, New Taxes in Budget, New Taxes in Healthcare, Record Debt and Government Spending.

Wayne Smith — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:25:42 +0000

You can not spend your way out of a recession has been said enough times that now Obama may just consider it a “talking point.” Reducing the cost of health care for seniors has also become an old talking point of the 2008 elections. Now taxing a recession is becoming a talking point.

The realities that increasing costs for businesses to hire employees will make them not hire employees has escape those who have faith in their President; They need to place their faith in God not Obama.

Ironically AARP Forum RE Massa: We know about the bribes.

Wayne Smith — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:24:17 +0000

Many of the basic facts are across the internet. I think a fair statement would be “You can not fire me! I quit.”

AARP Forum
We know about the bribes. How about the blackmail & smear campaigns that have covnveniently happened to politicians that would oppose Obama administration? NY govenor was smeared right after he refused to not run. A few dems had initial smear stories on MSNBC that were not followed up after the targeted legislators voted with party the next week. And in case you missed it Maddow started on Fri. smear of Stupak. Will Stupak stay the course & vote his convictions and get smeared or will he bow to blackmail & story will disappear?

The interview on Glenn Beck was not from a man with a lot of fight left in him. No sign of the nobel reasons to be in public office. While he wants to retain his standards – which he said he did not while in office – he does not represent that others have those standards; no demands from him that they should.

It does seem that he has accomplished getting to the exit and out the door without being hit to hard by the door. The description of his experience is one of day to day operations of following demands of the money – the Oligarchy – but does not confirm the names. And, being directed as to what to do by “the leadership” naming the structure of congressional whips who are not named but … that would be CA 30 – Cap and Trade – Henry Waxman.

It’s about to get interesting

Wayne Smith — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:13:24 +0000

The next 30 days are going to be marked by those entering the race for political office. They need to register with the state for their 2010 election; They need to meet with people. Indeed it has already started DeVore gains momentum against Barbara Boxer.

These people have stepped up to represent the people many are making themselves available on twitter and other forums. Within the next few weeks those who are in congress and want to be in 2011 will need to start meeting with people, and not saying things like – this is my meeting not yours -

CBS Glorifies Obama for Christian Compassion!

Wayne Smith — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:02:37 +0000

Hat Tip NewsBusters

Near the end of Monday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Erica Hill touted a new Parade magazine survey on volunteerism in America: “it indicates America is in the midst of what some are calling a compassion boom.” Moments later, the magazine’s contributing editor, Emily Listfield, argued: “There’s something we call the ‘Obama Effect.’ People are responding to the President’s call to service.”

The contrast with the truth I believe is all that need be said.

Forgive Barbara Boxer but vote her out of office

Wayne Smith — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:51:37 +0000

Forgiving does not mean to hold up somebody who has shown poor judgment and offer excuses for their poor judgment to positions were they will use their judgment. It is possible for people to learn from their mistakes and learn – It is also possible for people not to learn and continue to make them.

It is possible for pro-choice advocates to change; And, that is a great thing; But, Barbara Boxer has not changed. Boxer voted to block Stupak amendment, and against other amendments from representatives of the people, that stop tax payer funding of abortion. If life were on a scale (it is not) between two evils – her position would be to the extreme on the right to kill side. Forgiving does not mean allowing somebody to continue to kill.

The Congress are voted on by the people to represent the people – Boxer does not even know who the people are!

Does Boxer really believe the millions who have attempted to have their voices heard not citizens! Or that they are the same people and travel around the country from place to place (sometimes on the same day)! Or that the American people have been corrupted by Lobbyists and Special interests. That the American people have been paid off by the insurance industry? Unions? Acorn? Overseas donations?

Does she think they smell?

Forgiveness does not mean allowing people to be unjustly slandered.

Emerging alternatives include
Chuck Devore for California Senate
Ed Martine MO 3
Joe Heck Nevada
bill Johnson Kentucky
Rob McCarthy Jr Boston, MA
Thomas Zaleski Azirona
Ari DavidI am running for Congress against Henry Waxman
John DennisChallenging Nancy Pelosi in 2010 for personal liberty, peace, and fiscal sanity in San Francisco – CA’s 8th District

The Demonization of #teaparty – Prov 26:4 or Prov 26:5

Wayne Smith — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:16:31 +0000

Jules Crittenden post today – Crazy Shooter Identity

Admit it. One of the first things that goes through your head when you hear about another crazy shooter incident is … “Mohammed or Billy Bob?” Islamic extremist nutcase or homegrown ultra right-wing nutjob? What name are the cops going to release? Which side, politically, is going to say “Told you so.”

Hat Tip to Talk Wisdom for locating the post.

Legal Insurrection is also on top of it:

Despite their worst intentions, the people who try to tie every act of violence to the Tea Party movement are going to have trouble spinning the Pentagon shooting by J. Patrick Bedell.

It has become pretty clear pretty quickly that Bedell sufferred from Bush Derangement Syndrome, and was a 9/11 Truther, just like 35% of Democrats as of May 2007.

But that’s not to say the left-wing blogosphere will not try to spin this into something it is not (image right).

How much bad information is out in the public about the Teaparty and Christianity as a whole. Some are putting out information that parts of the bible are “HATE” speech. If this goes unanswered it is reasonable that some believe it as true.

While Proverbs 26:4 says “Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself.” Proverbs 26:5 says “Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes.”

In not answering slanderous lies – The person becomes convinced he is correct and works to convince others to his revelation, which in reality is a lie. These slanderous charges must be answered, Not with another foolish lie, but with the truth. Do not argue but end the argument … Several examples of how are on Snt Johnny’s postThe Silence of the Wolves: Atheists Turn Docile in Face of the Facts – Answer a fool but do so wisely.

Additional Reading

Obama’s other nuke option – Sign Reidcare without reconciliation and 51 votes.

Wayne Smith — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:07:39 +0000

This morning I posted on the front page a link to Prediction: Obama Will Sign Senate Bill If Reconciliation Fails and on twitter

The possibility of Obama signing Reid Care without addressing the differences in the house and senate exists and is now starting to go viral.

Hot Air Theory of the day: Obama will stab the House in the back by abandoning reconciliation after they pass the Senate bill

Voting Female Lists a link to the issue as additional reading.

Health Care BS Considers it a conspiracy theory.

I first encountered this latest black helicopter plot yesterday at William Jacobson’s blog, where he predicted that the House would pass the Senate bill, on the promise that it will be “fixed” via reconciliation, but that Obama will sign it into law whether it’s fixed or not.

I don’t doubt for a minute that Obama would do such a thing, but I have serious doubts that he’ll get the opportunity. Today, Jacobson’s theory bubbled up at Hot Air, where Ed Morrissey has been apparently been getting a lot of e-mail about it.

There are several problems with the current course of Obamacare that seem to suggest the only options are to start over or pass health care without the house:

Sorry, Can’t Pass Health Care Bill Without A Public Option

There are 435 seats on the House. Of those, 257 are filled by Democrats and 178 by Republicans. Which means a majority is 218. The Republicans have vowed to vote against health care, period. The Democrats can pass health care on their own, but if they lose 40 of their own, they only have 217 votes.

There are 57 Democrats who signed the July 30 letter saying that they “simply cannot vote” for a bill that “at minimum” does not have a public plan (PDF). There are 7 more not listed on the letter who have pledged to vote against any bill that does not have a robust public plan. That makes 64 Democrats who won’t vote for the “co-ops” that both Kathleen Sibelius and Robert Gibbs say the White House is “open” to.

Do the math: 257 – 64 = 193. They need 218 to pass the bill.

Anti-Choice Site Names The Stupak 12

The website lists the 12 House Democrats as follows: Bart Stupak (D-MI), Joseph Cao (R-LA), Jerry Costello (D-IL), Kathy Dahlkemper (D-PA), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Steve Dreihaus (D-OH), Brad Ellsworth (D-IN), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Dale Kildee (D-MI), Dan Lipinski (D-IL), Jim Oberstar (D-MN), and Charlie Wilson (D-OH).

Pelosi can not lose these votes and still pass the bill. The Senate rejected taking abortion funding out of the bill.

Now if you know this by reading blogs – It is a certainty that Obama know it. He knows it and is proceeding forward – not to have Obamacare fail but to write his legacy … Yes “I” Can.

Reconciliation: The Tyranny of Reid’s Majority

Wayne Smith — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:43:15 +0000

People who are pushing for Pelosicare, Reidcare or Obamacare will say reconciliation is a good and moral practice. They will site “Great” presidents who have used it. Or will they? Nobody printed on the US dollar has used it. Nobody who face is on a mountain has used it. No these people who are so honored warned against the tyranny of the majority and set in place protections against it – The 2/3rds rule. Reconciliation has been used to remove spending. It has been used to introduce changes to legislation. It has never been used to make massive changes in Government. Our greatest leaders never used it – Why would they? They were leaders not dictators.

2/3rds can be a difficult number. It is required to change the constitution or remove a president. Reconciliation was created to allow the congress to act quicker on small maters of state to prevent a filibuster. A filibuster requires 2/3rds to end it – It can be used at anytime but it is rarely used.

Our leaders have decided that 2/3rds may not be required to change 1/6th of our economy and impose a federal requirement that people must purchase insurance.

United for Obama goes under the “bus” New Name Coffeeparty

Wayne Smith — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:20:52 +0000

Hat Tip Legal Insurrection

More Astroturf Exposed

‘Grassroots’ Coffee Party Organizer Exposed as Obama Political Operative

American Public Policy Center – Two man anti teaparty movement.

Dems plan to astroturf conservative radio

Symptoms of Social Illness

Wayne Smith — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:45:21 +0000

Initially Published here

Tulsa Restaurant Patrons Step Over Shooting Victim To Reach Pickup Window

‘Biology-based’ restrooms called ‘discrimination’
‘Schools therefore cannot segregate students based on sexual orientation’

Baby girl survives after being shot in the chest in parents’ ‘global warming suicide pact’

Fox’s ‘Family Guy’ raking in the indecency complaints

Obama Voters In Focus Group Like Family Guy’s Attack On Palin

Without God, insanity is just around the corner