The, January 19th, Special Election for Massachusetts Senate could be the end of Obamacare.

http://www.brownforussenate.com/

Obama once made the case that infanticide laws for blotched abortions should not provide for the emergency care of the infant. Having a doctor to care for these living children was revisiting a decision that has already been reached.

Under this mind set what then would be the reason to reconsider a sentence of a death row convict – As the court has already made a decision.

Under both Reid-care and Pelosi-care, both versions of Obamacare. Euthanasia is considered a treatment for those that somebody other than the patent decides does not have a good enough quality of life.

Why Care for Patients When Killing Them Is So Much Easier & Cheaper?

Care for the terminally ill had declined, she said, since euthanasia became legal, and more should have been done to give legal protection to those who wanted a natural death.

In 2008, Dutch doctors reported 2,331 cases of euthanasia, 400 cases of assisted suicide and 550 deaths without request. There is, of course, no record of the cases that weren’t reported

If one could consider euthanasia moral health care because somebody has decided they would not have a good enough life and ending it is in the best interest of the budget. Then what justification continues to exists to not terminate the life of people who are jailed for a life sentence.  Unlike somebody who is ill and may get better – somebody jailed for life would never be able to improve their quality of life and there is absolute certainty that they would cost the tax payer money until their life is over, or their sentence is reconsidered.

Yes some convicts are innocent – but all unborn children are innocent.

There are many problems in the bills that have not even come to light because they have not done the due diligence to actually read them and consider what effects the bill will have … Look at this example from MSNBC.

The House tax credits are available only if your employees’ average wages don’t exceed $40,000 a year, while the Senate allows firms with average wages of up to $50,000 to qualify.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34609984/ns/health-health_care/

Now if the owner gets an above average wage of $50,000 a year then he must reduce workers pay to get the credits. This will accomplish one thing, the elimination of getting raises for workers who merit one because of the good job they do.  It will also step on overtime because if the “payroll” goes above the average of $50,000 or $40,000 a year the government will want a large amount of cash – this is gross not net; although MSNBC does not indicate if it is the gross payroll paid (which includes additional business taxes such as 8% SSI and workers comp) or the gross payments shown on the workers paystub.

I may be jumping the gun with this headline; However, the signs are clearly written on the wall.

Senators Consider Soda Tax to Help Fund Health Care Overhaul

The Senate Finance Committee is set to hear proposals from about a dozen experts about how to pay for the comprehensive health-care overhaul, including a proposal to tax sugary drinks.

Look at the tax increases for cigarettes, made under the claim that smoking increases the health care costs for the community. Look at the rules that restaurants must provide nutritional information for all items on their menu.

The writing is on the wall, Obamacare if it succeeds will open the door wide open for the Health Care Czar to make decisions about lifestyles. It would be naive to believe that politics would not play a large part of these decisions. For example it would be unlikely that the Health Czar would promote waiting for marriage before having sex … indeed abortion on demand is covered in the plan.

Neither indoctrination or fear, which are more signs of a cult than anything else, represent a objective search for the truth. Would an attorney use fear as a reason to show that a jury should find for his argument? No that would not be a true indication of the guilt of one of the parties. Likewise the use of indoctriniation and fear can only be called what they are propaganda. Propaganda is a political tool not a research tool.

Hat Tips to Stop The ACLU, Big Government and Climate Depo for this video.

Science when it is free to ask questions is not of much use for propaganda. Like totalitarian political regimes who suppress political information this tactic can be used, and should raise red flags, in science. Science is the search (a verb) for knowledge, science does not exist when questions can not be asked.

Excerpt From Human Events

… There have been parallels cases where e-mail traffic was released showing Darwinian scientists displaying the same contempt for fair play and academic openness as we see now in the climate emails. One instance involved a distinguished astrophysicist at Iowa State University, Guillermo Gonzalez, who broke ranks with colleagues in his department over the issue of intelligent design in cosmology. Released under the Iowa Open Records Act, e-mails from his fellow scientists at ISU showed how his department conspired against him, denying Dr. Gonzales tenure as retribution for his views.

To me, the most poignant correspondence emerging from CRU e-mails involves discussion about punishing a particular editor at a peer-reviewed journal who was defying the orthodox establishment by publishing skeptical research.

In 2004, a peer-reviewed biology journal at the Smithsonian Institution published a technical essay of mine presenting a case for intelligent design. Colleagues of the journal’s editor, an evolutionary biologist, responded by taking away his office, his keys and his access to specimens, placing him under a hostile supervisor and spreading disinformation about him. Ultimately, he was demoted, prompting an investigation of the Smithsonian by the U.S. Office of Special Counsel. …

Reid care as it stands uses tax payer money and forced (enforced by the IRS) premiums to pay for abortion on demand. It can not be stopped without people contacting their senators on this issue.

Get full details here: http://stoptheabortionmandate.com/webcast/

Consider it a gift of your time for those who are unable to defend themselves.

“Slashing Medicare by nearly $500 billion, one-half a trillion dollars, to create a new federal health care entitlement is not health-care reform,” McCain said in a statement. Read text of McCain’s amendment.

Hat Tip wonkette John McCain Whines About Old People For Several Minutes