Archive for November, 2009

Don’t neglect Christian shops during Black Friday

I’ve been active in the War on Christmas to keep vendors from removing the word. I consider the issue important for many reasons; I’ll just state one; missionaries overseas who are unable to talk freely about Christianity are able to talk about the US. We can not give anything to a God who already has everything, but we can give charity to those in need. Christians believe in a loving God, charity is one way we can return love.

Christian vendors do not need to have people question them about the word Christmas. It is freely used.

I’ve had the honor of working with a new Christian ministry http://www.signpostkids.com/ that is working to produce educational material for children. Material that does not go against Christian principles … Yes they are using the word Christmas for Black Friday specials.

Larry O’Donnell argues for God’s Judgement on Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) on Abortion

Communion is a Christian scriptural practice based on 1 Corinthians 11:24 “and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.” For those who do not believe in Jesus by their own belief does not believe in communion. And if one does not believe what the scripture says about communion then its practice is an dishonest act to pretend to be something they are not.

Those who do should take time and consider 1 Cor. 11:26-29 “For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes. 27 Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For he who eats and drinks, eats and drinks judgment to himself, if he does not judge the body rightly.”

I do not know exactly what Larry O’Donnell believes, He has made the statement on National News that ‘Roman Catholic bishop who barred Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) from taking communion a “political hack.”‘ This is in issue to Partick’s pro-choice positions … there are many scriptural references against the choice to kill an innocent child because it is not loved. While what is in Partick’s heart is only known to God and himself his public actions are known to the world.

Psalm 139:13-15

“You did form my inward parts, you knit me together in my mother’s womb…you knew me right well; my frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret…”

Jeremiah1:4-5

“Now the word of the Lord came to me, saying, Before I formed you in the womb, I k(Living Bible Version)

Proverbs 24:11-12

“Rescue those who are unjustly sentenced to death; don’t stand back and let them die. Don’t try to disclaim responsibility by saying you didn’t know about it.”

Proverbs 6:16-17

“The Lord hates hands that shed innocent blood.”

Matthew 5:21

“Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill…”

Psalm 127:3

“Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is His reward.”

The attraction of interventionism for the greedy

The greedy have a problem with the free market. When people are free to say no to spending their money the greedy are forced to give equal value for equal value. Trading is done without force.

Interventionism, which is a step towards socialism but does not place complete control of services or assets in the hands of the Government, Is by its nature more attractive to greed.

Take for example Cap N Trade; here we have a system which requires trade in carbon credits for an energy company to continue to provide a service. Nothing could be more alluring to people who idolize wealth; and people are lining up to exploit the need requirement that some will be forced in to trade.

Look at the national teachers union; Another example of trade by force; teachers are required to be members and fund the lobbying efforts of whatever the union wants to spend their membership funds on.

Examples of trade in the bible are done without force. “Listen to me, my lord; the land is worth four hundred shekels of silver, but what is that between me and you? Bury your dead – Genesis 23:15

Testimonies of Change from the inside out are powerful stuff

I am thinking not talking about moralism, but real heartfelt change. The change that comes from allowing Jesus into the most secret parts of ones life. Real change!



RINO – Recovery In Name Only

Obamatrons are now attempting to claim the economy is a Obama success, and they are pointing to the DOW at $10,000 as evidence but remain willfully blind to the fact that the drop in value of the dollar is driving the price of stocks up.

Why Moralism Is Not the Gospel — And Why So Many Christians Think It Is

Hat tip to Albert Mohler

One of the most amazing statements by the Apostle Paul is his indictment of the Galatian Christians for abandoning the Gospel. “I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel,” Paul declared. As he stated so emphatically, the Galatians had failed in the crucial test of discerning the authentic Gospel from its counterfeits.

His words could not be more clear: “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you have received, he is to be accursed!” [Gal. 1:6-7]

This warning from the Apostle Paul, expressed in the language of the Apostle’s shock and grief, is addressed not only to the church in Galatia, but to every congregation in every age. In our own day — and in our own churches — we desperately need to hear and to heed this warning. In our own time, we face false gospels no less subversive and seductive than those encountered and embraced by the Galatians.

In our own context, one of the most seductive false gospels is moralism. This false gospel can take many forms and can emerge from any number of political and cultural impulses. Nevertheless, the basic structure of moralism comes down to this — the belief that the Gospel can be reduced to improvements in behavior.

Sadly, this false gospel is particularly attractive to those who believe themselves to be evangelicals motivated by a biblical impulse. Far too many believers and their churches succumb to the logic of moralism and reduce the Gospel to a message of moral improvement. In other words, we communicate to lost persons the message that what God desires for them and demands of them is to get their lives straight.

In one sense, we are born to be moralists. Created in God’s image, we have been given the moral capacity of conscience. From our earliest days our conscience cries out to us the knowledge of our guilt, shortcomings, and misbehaviors. In other words, our conscience communicates our sinfulness.

Add to this the fact that the process of parenting and child rearing tends to inculcate moralism from our earliest years. Very quickly we learn that our parents are concerned with our behavior. Well behaved children are rewarded with parental approval, while misbehavior brings parental sanction. This message is reinforced by other authorities in young lives and pervades the culture at large.

Writing about his own childhood in rural Georgia, the novelist Ferrol Sams described the deeply-ingrained tradition of being “raised right.” As he explained, the child who is “raised right” pleases his parents and other adults by adhering to moral conventions and social etiquette. A young person who is “raised right” emerges as an adult who obeys the laws, respects his neighbors, gives at least lip service to religious expectations, and stays away from scandal. The point is clear — this is what parents expect, the culture affirms, and many churches celebrate. But our communities are filled with people who have been “raised right” but are headed for hell.

The seduction of moralism is the essence of its power. We are so easily seduced into believing that we actually can gain all the approval we need by our behavior. Of course, in order to participate in this seduction, we must negotiate a moral code that defines acceptable behavior with innumerable loopholes. Most moralists would not claim to be without sin, but merely beyond scandal. That is considered sufficient.

Moralists can be categorized as both liberal and conservative. In each case, a specific set of moral concerns frames the moral expectation. As a generalization, it is often true that liberals focus on a set of moral expectations related to social ethics while conservatives tend to focus on personal ethics. The essence of moralism is apparent in both — the belief that we can achieve righteousness by means of proper behavior.

The theological temptation of moralism is one many Christians and churches find it difficult to resist. The danger is that the church will communicate by both direct and indirect means that what God expects of fallen humanity is moral improvement. In so doing, the church subverts the Gospel and communicates a false gospel to a fallen world.

Christ’s Church has no option but to teach the Word of God, and the Bible faithfully reveals the law of God and a comprehensive moral code. Christians understand that God has revealed Himself throughout creation in such a way that He has gifted all humanity with the restraining power of the law. Furthermore, He has spoken to us in His word with the gift of specific commands and comprehensive moral instruction. The faithful Church of the Lord Jesus Christ must contend for the righteousness of these commands and the grace given to us in the knowledge of what is good and what is evil. We also have a responsibility to bear witness of this knowledge of good and evil to our neighbors. The restraining power of the law is essential to human community and to civilization.

Just as parents rightly teach their children to obey moral instruction, the church also bears responsibility to teach its own the moral commands of God and to bear witness to the larger society of what God has declared to be right and good for His human creatures.

But these impulses, right and necessary as they are, are not the Gospel. Indeed, one of the most insidious false gospels is a moralism that promises the favor of God and the satisfaction of God’s righteousness to sinners if they will only behave and commit themselves to moral improvement.

The moralist impulse in the church reduces the Bible to a codebook for human behavior and substitutes moral instruction for the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Far too many evangelical pulpits are given over to moralistic messages rather than the preaching of the Gospel.

The corrective to moralism comes directly from the Apostle Paul when he insists that “a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus.” Salvation comes to those who are “justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified.” [Gal. 2:16]

We sin against Christ and we misrepresent the Gospel when we suggest to sinners that what God demands of them is moral improvement in accordance with the Law. Moralism makes sense to sinners, for it is but an expansion of what we have been taught from our earliest days. But moralism is not the Gospel, and it will not save. The only gospel that saves is the Gospel of Christ. As Paul reminded the Galatians, “But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.” [Gal. 4:4-5]

We are justified by faith alone, saved by grace alone, and redeemed from our sin by Christ alone. Moralism produces sinners who are (potentially) better behaved. The Gospel of Christ transforms sinners into the adopted sons and daughters of God.

The Church must never evade, accommodate, revise, or hide the law of God. Indeed, it is the Law that shows us our sin and makes clear our inadequacy and our total lack of righteousness. The Law cannot impart life but, as Paul insists, it “has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.” [Gal. 3:24]

The deadly danger of moralism has been a constant temptation to the church and an ever-convenient substitute for the Gospel. Clearly, millions of our neighbors believe that moralism is our message. Nothing less than the boldest preaching of the Gospel will suffice to correct this impression and to lead sinners to salvation in Christ.

Hell will be highly populated with those who were “raised right.” The citizens of heaven will be those who, by the sheer grace and mercy of God, are there solely because of the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ.

Moralism is not the gospel.

http://www.albertmohler.com/2009/09/03/why-moralism-is-not-the-gospel-and-why-so-many-christians-think-it-is/

Married and with childred study says produces more happiness especially for women but unmarried couples with childred a different story

Hat tip for the finding the study to Value Voters News
MARRIED WITH CHILDREN PAVES WAY TO HAPPINESS
Want to be a happy married couple?  Consider having kids.  A new study found that having children boosts happiness.  And the more, literally, the merrier.
But unmarried couples shouldn’t expect to find greater happiness through child-raising.  The study, published in the Oct. 14 online edition of the Journal of Happiness Studies, suggests that having children has little or no effect on boosting happiness among couples who aren’t hitched:

  • The findings contradict previous research that suggested that having more offspring doesn’t lead to greater happiness and might even make people less satisfied with their lives.
  • One theory behind the conclusion is that parents don’t receive many rewards in return for the hard work of raising children.
  • The new study, however, notes that parents say children are one of the most important things in their lives, if not the most important.
  • The study found that life satisfaction for married people — women especially — goes up the more kids they have. Single, separated and co-habiting people, by contrast, report negative experiences.

“One is tempted to advance that children make people better off under the ‘right conditions’ — a time in life when people feel that they are ready, or at least willing, to enter parenthood,” Dr. Luis Angeles, of the University of Glasgow in Scotland, said in a news release from the journal’s publisher.  “This time can come at very different moments for different individuals, but a likely signal of its approach may well be the act of marriage.”
Source: Randy Dotinga, “Married With Children Paves Way to Happiness; Satisfaction with life goes up as family size increases, study finds,” MSN.com/HealthDay News, November 4, 2009.
For text:
http://health.msn.com/kids-health/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100248065&GT1=31036
For study:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/a34114m070112044/

Bojidar Marinov / The American Vision: ‘I’m Not A Social Reformer, I’m Here to Preach the Gospel’

Article at http://www.americanvision.org/article/im-not-a-social-reformer-im-here-to-preach-the-gospel/

Suppose you are a member of the Mission Committee of your church, and there are a number of missionaries that you support around the world. There is a missionary who you specifically are very fond of, a bright, committed and active guy in the jungles of the Amazon, working among the indigenous tribes there. He sends back amazing reports about scores of natives converted to Christianity, evangelistic outreach, churches planted and so on. The Mission Committee is happy to support him, and your church is proud to display him as one of the most successful missionaries you’ve ever supported.

Continue

Why do we need Marriage Part 2 – Marriage as a beginning point of a family

The real benefit of marriage brings up other questions, but these questions are pointless if there were no benefit of marriage. Those questions follow the understanding of why society needs marriage, they do not proceed it: they are what abouts, parts 3 and 4. The issues of biblical intimacy outside of marriage will also be covered in an upcoming post.

Many will point to marriage as a way not to sin. They point out that biblical intimacy outside of marriage is a sin, but fail to point out that immature sex can still exist inside of marriage. There is a relationship lacking in any marriage that is based on nothing more than sex.

What is the cause and effect of  intimacy inside of marriage and how does that tie into a beginning? I am not bringing this up because people do not know the answer; rather because they know it so well they never state it and it is being overlooked!

Marriage is a beginning and married with children is normal progression.

A family with one mom and one dad is a benefit to children.

  • The post will be updated with many benefits (here is just a few to start).
  • Children learn different things from their mom vs their dad.
  • Girls model their mother, and learn how relationships work by seeing her relationship with her dad.
  • Boys model their fathers, and learn how relationships work by seeing his relationship with his mom.
  • The parents although not perfect has accomplished making a family the children learn how to accomplish this by learning how their parents accomplished a family.

Parents have by nature a prospective that goes beyond their own wants and needs, indeed it extends far into the future to the benefit of people who will exist after they have long pasted away.

The reason society needs marriage is because society needs parents. Parenting is serious work, a generation without parents would be the last generation. Without children they will never be able to retire, a generation without children will suffer a horrible end as they grow in wisdom but lose physical strength. Why do I care as I will be dead before the society ended – because my children won’t be, nor their friends, because it would be horrible, I wish nobody suffers it even if I am not there to witness it.

Parents are a need to society in the same way food is. If either food or parents ends then society itself will end. Society does not need people to be happy;  Saying the society needs marriage to make people happy is false, unhappy people will always exist in society and it is impossible to make everybody happy – even if it were possible, happiness is a emotion that comes and goes for those who do not live in a institution.

Children need parents who have a lifetime commitment. This commitment is called marriage and is a very old word. Marriage needs to continue as long as it is needed for children and that looks like it will be for a very long time – Society needs families.

AARP continues to offer insurance for what Obamacare will not cover.

AARP came out in support of Obamacare. Many say that its endorsement (and lobby efforts for seniors) means that seniors get acceptable care, or even all of the care that they need that is what AARP lobbied for.

If AARP believes this to be true then there would no longer be a need for the additional coverage marketed by AARP. Seems the endorsement does not mean seniors get all the coverage then need and AARP will provide the balance for a price.